A- de 2018
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Cristina Pardo Schlesinger
✓Claimant Diana Maria Umaña
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Rechazar por no invocarse ninguna de las causales de nulidad
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Solicitud de nulidad de la Sentencia T-304/17.
La Corte considera que la petición formulada no alega ninguna circunstancia relativa a una presunta violación o afectación del derecho al debido proceso en sede de revisión, en tanto no se invocó ninguna de las causales de nulidad establecidas en la jurisprudencia constitucional.
Precisa, que la inconformidad planteada lo que cuestiona es un actuar de la parte demandada y no de las actuaciones judiciales adoptadas por la Sala de Revisión.
Se RECHAZA.
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- PRIMERO. RECHAZAR la solicitud de nulidad de la sentencia T-304 del 2017, proferida por la Sala Séptima de Revisión.
- SEGUNDO. Contra este pronunciamiento no procede recurso alguno.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.